The U.S. needs to negotiate with North Korea > 편집국 기자실

본문 바로가기
편집국 기자실

The U.S. needs to negotiate with North Korea

페이지 정보

작성자 관리자 작성일16-10-06 15:18 댓글0건

본문

The U.S. needs to negotiate with North Korea

Kim Jong Un waves at parade participants in Pyongyang, North Korea. (Wong Maye-E/Associated Press)

By Jane Harman and James Person September 30

 

Jane Harman, president and chief executive of the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, served in the House of Representatives (D-Calif.) from 1993 to 2011. James Person is coordinator of the Hyundai Motor-Korea Foundation Center for Korean History and Public Policy at the Wilson Center. The views expressed are their own.

 

Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result. For years we have applied industrial-strength unilateral and multilateral sanctions in an attempt to force North Korea to denuclearize. We have also urged China — North Korea’s neighbor and largest trading partner — to use its unique leverage to halt Kim Jong Un’s provocations, which also threaten China.

 

But neither strategy is working. North Korea continues to make progress in testing ballistic missiles and bombs and possibly even in miniaturizing warheads.

 

Six months after the implementation of harsh new sanctions under U.N. Security Council Resolution 2270, North Korea remains defiant. While few expected the sanctions to work overnight, the timeline for any results will be even longer than most anticipate. Sanctions are uniquely ineffective against North Korea. Since the Korean War, the country has faced sanctions-like conditions restricting its access to markets, international financial institutions, and advanced goods and technologies. It became extremely adept at living under these conditions.

 

Throughout this period, North Korea has also essentially self-sanctioned. Its leaders have chosen economic isolation over integration into the global economy. To maintain their freedom of action, they didn’t even integrate into the socialist economic bloc. They muddle through by mobilizing indigenous human and material resources and, when things really get bad, letting a segment of the population perish.

 

The effectiveness of sanctions is also limited because of China’s protection. Chinese leaders recognize that their economic leverage over North Korea is a double-edged sword, because sustained pressure could lead to state and societal collapse, precipitating a flood of refugees into northeast China. The collapse of North Korea could also lead to a unified, U.S.-allied Korea on China’s border — which China perceives as a worse outcome than a nuclear North Korea serving as a buffer state.

 

Besides, U.S. analysts of North Korea have long exaggerated the submissiveness of Pyongyang to Beijing. Communist-bloc documents obtained by the Wilson Center suggest that over many decades, North Korea has perceived China as intrusive and disrespectful of Korean sovereignty. Expecting China to influence North Korean policies means asking China to do precisely what North Korea most resents. Chinese officials recognized that complying with the West’s wishes would only antagonize North Korea further.

 

Our timelines are simply out of sync. It will take far too long for sanctions to persuade North Korea’s leaders to complete verifiable and irreversible dismantlement as a prerequisite for talks, and we also can’t expect China to use all of the cards in its deck. Meanwhile, each new test demonstrates real progress in the development of Pyongyang’s weapons programs, and North Korea gets closer to mounting a warhead on a missile capable of striking one of our allies or a U.S. military base in the region, or even the United States itself.

 

Nonetheless, the United States has an underappreciated ace in its deck: North Korea has been trying to talk to us since 1974. Only the United States — the supposed existential threat that justifies its nuclear and ballistic missile programs — can fully address Pyongyang’s security concerns.

 

To do so, we would have to demonstrate some flexibility. The lesson North Korea’s leaders learned from the Iraq War and NATO intervention in Libya was that no outlier state without nuclear deterrence is safe. Displays of military might — sending B-1 bombers along the demilitarized zone or ships and submarines off the North Korean coast — only make an insecure Pyongyang more recalcitrant. Failing to acknowledge North Korea’s concerns in some small way, even if we consider those concerns unfounded, makes progress harder.

 

While the denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula remains the long-term goal, we propose using this U.S. leverage to enter into talks with Pyongyang with the stated goal of negotiating a freeze of all North Korean nuclear and long-range missile tests and a return of International Atomic Energy Agency inspectors. Realistically, this can only be achieved through direct talks with North Korea, not a return to a six-party process that evoked too much mistrust among key stakeholders, especially between Pyongyang and Beijing.

 

 

A freeze would be only the beginning. North Korea has agreed to freezes before only to restart programs once talks stalled or the United States turned its attention elsewhere. But we need to take North Korea seriously and work into any deal contingencies for cheating. Washington has recent comparable experience in hammering out the Iran nuclear deal, however imperfect it may be.

 

And after a freeze, the next administration must invest significant diplomatic capital in moving talks toward the eventual goal of complete, verifiable and irreversible dismantlement. This will likely demand additional flexibility on the part of the United States, including the use of carrots as well as sticks. If there are prospects for significant progress, we should consider suspension of future joint military exercises with South Korea and offer North Korea the nonaggression pact it has long sought.

 

A short-term freeze could also buy time to lessen tensions on the peninsula and throughout the region, and pave a path to moderating the brutal tactics of the North Korean regime against its own people. Done right, there is a way out of the insanity.

 

[FROM:THE WASHIONG POST]

 

[이 게시물은 관리자님에 의해 2016-10-06 15:19:24 새 소식에서 복사 됨]
추천 0

댓글목록

등록된 댓글이 없습니다.

인기게시물
[재미동포 기고문] 무지에서 깨달음으로 - 10년 전 평양이 내게 가르쳐준 것
[재미동포 기고문] 교복증정식에서 조선교육의 품격을 본다
[재미동포 기고문] 화전에서 시작된 불씨 - ㅌㄷ제국주의동맹
[재미동포 기고문] 조선인민의 꿈은 곧 실천이다
[재미동포 기고문] 오 필승, 코리아 - 빈 의자와 김구 선생의 인장 이야기
【로동신문】국제관계의 새로운 변천은 막을수 없는 시대의 흐름
[로동신문] 집요한 참배놀음은 로골적인 재침야망의 발로/유럽스스로가 초래하는 안보불안
최근게시물
[사진으로 보는 로동신문] 11월 13일 (목)
[KCTV 조선중앙텔레비죤 보도] 11월 12일 (수)
[로동신문] 3대혁명로선의 전략적 지위와 변혁적 의의 해설
【로동신문】자본주의의 《번영》사는 환경파괴, 인간의 정신적부패의 행적
【조선의 소리】보건부문의 새로운 질적변화 외 2
[조선중앙통신 - 외교단신] 조선민주주의인민공화국 공보위원회와 로씨야련방 수자발전,체신 및 대중공보성사이의 …
【조선신보】올해도 펼쳐진 흐뭇한 화폭, 각지 농촌들에서 결산분배
【로동신문】로동당의 품, 사회주의 조선에만 있는 현실
국가보안법을 폐지하고, 사법부는 각성하라! - 이정훈 연구위원(전 통일시대 연구위원), 국가보안법 위반 혐…
[사진으로 보는 로동신문] 11월 12일 (수)
[KCTV 조선중앙텔레비죤 보도] 11월 11일 (화)
【민주조선】사회주의보건발전의 새 력사를 펼쳐주시여
Copyright ⓒ 2000-2025 KANCC(Korean American National Coordinating Council). All rights reserved.
E-mail:  :  webmaster@kancc.org